Hey everyone,
I have not been able to find a definitive answer for this question and was hoping that someone could answer this. Is there a problem with replicating DFS Namespace root folders, rather then creating the shared folders under the namespace root?
For instance we have two servers with two additional large drives each. We would like to have each drive hold it's own DFS namespace, then replicate it to the other server. For instance, both server A and B would have D:\Public folder that would be \\network\Public name space. And both server A and B would have E:\Home folder that would be \\network\Home name space. Then just create a replication group for \\network\Public and another for \\network\Home.
Thanks in advance.