Quantcast
Channel: File Services and Storage forum
Viewing all 13565 articles
Browse latest View live

hard drive error making storage spaces not work

$
0
0

Hey All,

I have created a virtual disk (consisting of 2 physical disks) a while ago, according to essentials dashboard I have a critical warning that one of my disks is not functioning or is offline.

When I use the main dashboard, and under virtual disks (of which there are 3) they all show a yellow warning and when I hover the mouse it just says unknown: detached.

the status of the physical disks is ok but I am not able to view or do anything with the virtual disks.

I tried to run chkdsk but want sure how when the disks are offline

on control panel - action center, it says all disks are ok

what do I do to get the drives back so that I can move my content onto them (currently everything is on the c drive and its almost full)

regards,


Map two drive locations on one letter

$
0
0

So I have this problem.

I have 2 servers. A Linux Samba-fileserver and a Windows Server 2012 R2 DC. I have a program running on the Windows Server that will automatically sync the files between them. The point of which is that it is redundant and if the windows server will give out, I can still work on the Linux fileserver with the same files.

Now I have a certain amount of drive mappings that I have set via a GPO. These drive mappings are the folders that are on the Windows Server, which the Linux server will sync.

My question is: If the Windows Server gives out, is there a way to make it so that the drive mapping will automatically get adjusted to the Linux IP instead of giving the disconnected message?

Slooow StorageSpaces when transfering large files.

$
0
0

I have a Storage Space with 5 HDD and two SSD in Tiering. Server 2012r2 with latest patches.

When I copy files < 4 GB I get about 130 MB/sek. If I choose HUGE files, like 20 GB vhdx it looks like below.

Anyone have any idea why this is? I dont know if its the hardware or storage spaces; It feels "hardware".

DFS Alternative?

$
0
0

Hi there,

I have two offices running File servers on each end. Staff at each office primarily works off their own corresponding File server for obvious speed benefit.

Also, these offices are connected via VPN tunnel so each office has access to each site's File servers. One office has a beefy Fiber internet and the other having a pretty crappy ADSL.

I am looking for a way to have the 2 file severs "unified" so everyone works off the "same drives". On top of the unification it will provide data redundancy.

I looked at DFS and while looking good, it has a flaw when it comes to locked files, of which we have many. Our company primarily works with AutoCAD, Revit, PDF, Word, Excel files and they are often locked OR the same file is being worked on simultaneously.

Can anyone please suggest what solution would work best for my scenario? Again, from reading about DFS, it may not be the right solution.

REFS - The file system detected a checksum error and was not able to correct it

$
0
0

I'm getting the following errors on a 20TB REFS volume.  Please advise.

Event ID 133

The file system detected a checksum error and was not able to correct it. The name of the file or folder is "<unable to determine file name>".

Event ID 134

The file system was unable to write metadata to the media backing volume E:. A write failed with status "The volume repair was not successful." ReFS will take the volume offline. It may be mounted again automatically.

Company Work Folder

$
0
0

Is it possible to setup a Work Folder for 20 coworkers? Like a Company drive.

Regards Nicolai.

Windows Server 2012 NFS server passwd sample

$
0
0

Does anyone have a sample passwd file they use for identity mapping?

I placed a passwd file in C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\etc with the following contents:

root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash

On reboot, Windows did not accept the file, because in the event log under Applications and Services\Microsoft\Windows\ServericsForNFS-Server\IdentityMapping I get a message warning that NFS file access is impaired:

Server for NFS is not configured for either Active Directory Lookup or User Name Mapping.

Without either Active Directory Lookup or User Name Mapping configured for the server, or Unmapped UNIX User Access configured on all shares, Server for NFS cannot grant file access to users.

Configure Server for NFS for either Active Directory Lookup or User Name Mapping using the Nfsadmin command-line tool, or Unmapped UNIX User Access using the Nfsshare command-line tool.

Massive NTFS Security Hole - Windows Server 2012 R2

$
0
0

I'm so flabbergasted by this problem, there is no other title that fits.

Goal: I have a shared network folder with a "Scans" sub folder that I do not want a user to be able to change or delete.  However, I want them to be able to change and delete the subfolders and files of the "Scans" folder.  The"Scans" folder is a special folder that our network scanner scans to.  So, to recap, users (specifically the "Staff" user group) should be able to have full control to all subfolders and files of the top level network folder, but not able to change the "Scans" folder.

Problem: NO matter what I set for permissions, unless there are NO permissions at all, the user can delete the "Scans" folder.  

The top level network folder is called "Shared" and is shared from a Windows Server 2012 R2 system.  All share permissions are set to Everyone:Full control.  NTFS permissions on the top level "Shared" folder are as follows:

Administrators:F (This folder, subfolders, and files)
CREATOR OWNER:F (Subfolders and files)
SYSTEM:F (This folder, subfolders, and files)
CPSAdmin:F (A domain admin user) (This folder, subfolders, and files)
Domain Admins:F (This folder, subfolders, and files)
Staff:F (the user group in question) (This folder, subfolders, and files)

I create a subfolder called "Scans."  The proper NTFS permissions to accomplish this should be as follows:

Disable Inheritance
Administrators:F (This folder, subfolders, and files)
CREATOR OWNER:F (Subfolders and files)
SYSTEM:F (This folder, subfolders, and files)
CPSAdmin:F (This folder, subfolders, and files)
Domain Admins:F (This folder, subfolders, and files)
Staff:R (This folder only)
Staff:F (Subfolders and files)

The user navigates to the shared network folder and attempts to delete the Scans folder - SUCCESS.

I have tried the following additional combinations of permissions for the Staff group with the following results:

Remove them completely - they no longer can delete, or access the Scans folder.
Read Only on this folder, subfolders, and files - they can no longer create any subfolders or files, but they can still delete the "Scans" folder
Explicitly DENY modification, deletion, etc. to this folder - Users can still delete the "Scans" folder.

Its embarrassing really.  Such a basic, rudimentary thing that is so critical.  Yet, a huge gaping security hole.  It seems if the user is given any form of read permission to the folder they can delete it.

To top it all off - reviewing the Effective Permissions for this user group specifically shows that they have the intended permissions, that is,they CANNOT delete or modify the folder.  Yet, a member of the Staff user group can still delete the folder from a workstation.  Here is a screenshot of the effective permissions for a test user that can still delete the "Scans" folder:



It should also be noted that the owner of these folders is "Administrators" and that the logged on user is not a member of any other groups listed above. i.e. They are not domain admins, owners, or any other group that has access to this folder. As shown above, if I remove all permissions for "Staff" they lose all permissions to the folder as expected.

 I have no choice but to assume there is actually a serious NTFS bug here.


DFS on Server '08 - Error ID: 9032 (The connection is shutting down). Event ID: 5002

$
0
0
Well... DFS went down again for the 3rd time (each time a new issue) on my 2008 STD Servers.  This time I get the following message:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DFS Replication cannot replicate with partner <server> due to a communication error. The DFS Replication service used partner DNS name <server.domain>, IP address x.x.x.x, and WINS address <server> but failed with error ID: 9032 (The connection is shutting down). Event ID: 5002
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is some additional info:
  • These servers are in two different sites and communicate over a fairly slow VPN/WAN connection.  The first site has a 6mbps/512kbps DSL connection, and the second has a 2mbps/2mbps Cable connection - should be quick enough.
  • DFS replication is scheduled to run before and after normal business hours.
  • Our tape backup software (Symantec BackupExec 12) writes events in the File Services area stating that it is shuting down DFS for backup, but then it is also able to successfuly start it back up when it is finished.
  • We use a WAN optomizer to reduce the ammount of traffic sent over the WAN/LAN.  Port 5722 (dfs) is in bypass mode on the device since dfs traffic is encrypted and cannot be optimized.

DFS has done little to impress me thus far *big sigh* (although it has a nice interface!).  Anyone have any ideas?  I guess there is always MS Sync Toy.  :-)

Tried Migrating DFSR namespace from 2000 to 2008

$
0
0

I added a new DFSE Member and ran into an issue that led me to Follow along on this article to fix a connection issue: Migrate a Domain-based Namespace to Windows Server 2008 Mode - https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753875.aspx

I've run into an issue where the replication group is intact, the name space seems to be intact, though they don't know about each other's stuff. 

Within the Namespace, I select a shared folder, then I can see the folder Targets. Though under Replication, nothing is listed. Clicking the 'Folder Replication Wizard' link gives me an Error saying 'The Followinf targets cannot be added to DFS Replication Members, then lists each target with the error: the shared folder path D:\<Path> is already replicated on the server using replication group (Repl-GroupName)

The Replication Group says its 'Not Published'.  If I go to publish it, it says that there already exists a folder called \\domain\namespace\share

I can Access the Namespace with \\domain\<NameSpace>\Share with no issues.

The Replication group is replicating. 

Deduplication and "The tag present in reparse point buffer is invalid"

$
0
0

Hello!

I recently had an issue with Parity Storage Spaces on 3 disks when one of the Seagate disks seemed to cause data corruption that has not been detected by Storage Spaces and corrupted some of the volume's data, including NTFS itself. Nothing critical in my case, since I had backups of all corrupted files.

The problem become worse because data deduplication was turned on for the volume, which resulted in some interesting effects. For example, all restored files were corrupted again, probably when deduplication decided that it already holds and block with identical hash, and did not realize it were corrupted. So I turned it off an unoptimized.

However, I have one file which I cannot open, delete, move or rename with "Error0x80071129: The tag present in reparse point buffer is invalid".

fsutil reparsepoint query or fsutil reparsepoint deletereturns the same error. chkdsk does not report any problems.

How would I get rid of this file?

Windows Explorer hanging

$
0
0
We have several virtualized Server 2012 R2 servers that exhibit strange Windows Explorer issues.  After the servers have been running for a few days we notice that you can no longer browse the file system via Explorer.  When you click it you just get a blank Window and the swirl indicating it is working.  You can look at shares in things via computer management, can manage the file system remotely, and the servers seem to service client requests all day long.  You just can't browse the file system locally.  Once you reboot the machine it works fine for a few days and then acts up again.  Any ideas.

iSCSI connected NTFS volume

$
0
0
What's the maximum an iSCSI connected drive (from a NAS) can be?

Small Business Server 2003 Problem

$
0
0

Hello everyone!!

I have a small business server 2003 and I have configured it to make backups everyday at 3 o'clock in the morning!! Everyday when I checked if the previous backup was successfully completed its size was about 154 gb!! In the last couple of days the size of the backup is at 105 gb!! I went to the server management and clicked on the  Backup tab and shows that everything is succesfull. Any ideas why is that happening?

File Share not prompting for credentials

$
0
0

Dear All,

Just to give you an overview of our environment, we have this setup.

Windows Server 2012 R2 Joined to Domain.

Client Systems: Windows 7 mixed with Domain Joined and Workgroups & MAC Systems.

We have created Some Shared Folders, and have assigned Shared and NTFS permissions as per our requirement. The issue is that when we try to access these shares using UNC path, its not prompting for credentials.

Can you please help me to sort out these issues.

Thanks


VN


User can ONLY access her Network Drive on her Computer

$
0
0

The HR employee can only access her HR Network Drive on her Computer, but she should be able to access it on her Account, on any computer she logs into on the network. Can't seem to figure this one out, should be easy. Any help very much appreciated.

Running Windows Server 2008 r2

File Share permissions (Powershell)?

$
0
0

I have a PowerShell script that checks the users DistinguishedName from Active Directory and then runs a script on a remote file server to create a Home Drive.

I have used ACL to change the NTFS permissions to give the user full access to the files. 
But I need to change the Share permissions so that "everyone" has full control of the share?

I have managed to get it working on Server 2012 by using the following code: -

#create shared folder
New-SmbShare –Name $args$ –Path D:\Users\$args -FullAccess DOMAIN\$args, everyone

And I have managed to get this much done on Server 2008 R2

#create shared folder
$share = Get-WmiObject Win32_Share -List -ComputerName "FileServerName"
$share.create("D:\Users\$args", "$args$", 0)

But on server 2008 R2 it only gives "everyone" read access only?

any pointers in how to change this to "Full Control"?

*$args is used from the Invoke-Command-ComputerName FileServerName-ScriptBlock {*}ArgumentList$username


Technical Beta Tester || Matthew John Earley BSc (hons) || www.o0MattE0o.myby.co.uk



DFS Namespace on Azure VM and Azure Client VPN

$
0
0

Hi All,

I've created a new DFS namespace (\\company.local\Public) on Windows Server 2012 R2 in Microsoft Azure. As a reference I have used the following blog post: http://clemmblog.azurewebsites.net/high-available-file-share-in-windows-azure-using-dfs/

The next step was to connect a (domain joined) laptop to the Azure virtual network using the Azure VPN client. After connecting I can browse to the file servers and the shares that are present on the file servers but when I try to browse to the shares in the DFS namespace (\\company.local\Public\Data) I get the following error:

But when I ping the namespace (company.local) I get a reply.

 

I can also use Remote Desktop to connect to servers in my environment with the Azure VPN client active, it all falls apart when I try to browse to the dfs share. At the moment we're kinda lost for ideas so any hints or tips are welcome :)

P.S. I have configured DFSN to use the FQDN for use with workgroup machines.

SOFS rNIC DNS registration ???

$
0
0
I have two rNICs in two SOFS hosts configured with IP, subnet, DNS and the only IP addresses being registered in DNS are the two IP addresses for the MGMT NICs. I am expecting all 4 rNICs to be registered in DNS.  If I remove the MGMT NICs DNS entries and bounce the SOFS role they get recreated without the rNIC IP Addresses being registered. I have already reviewedhttp://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=13840.  Any ideas?

Time synchronization of files in Work Folder

$
0
0
Hello.

Help me change the time synchronization information in the working directory, that is, where I can change the range of time synchronization is automatically run ?. I would like Auto Sync instantly but do not do it in a loop specified time unless the usuaro the ejecuete manually.
This I would like to change it because if the user deletes a file in the folder, this does not sincronize at the moment but when you pass an interval of time and so he can retrieve information on the server. Or better not clear for some time.

Español:

Hola.

Necesito ayuda para modificar el tiempo de la sincronizacion de la informacion en la carpeta de trabajo, es decir, donde puedo modificar el rango de tiempo en que la sincronizacion se ejecute automaticamente?. Me gustaria que la sincronizacion automatica no se hiciera instantaneamente sino que lo haga en un lazo de tiempo especifico a no ser que el usuaro la ejecuete manualmente.
Esto me gustaria cambiarlo porque si el usuario borra un archivo en la carpeta, esta no sincronize en el instante sino cuando pase un intervalo de tiempo y asi el pueda recuperar la informacion en el servidor. O mejor que no se borre durante cierto tiempo.


Viewing all 13565 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>